the state of Indian Contemporary Art

I recently met up with an art dealer - someone who represents the artist and works for them to sell their paintings and artwork. This person informed me that the main reason why a lot of Indians [ and other interested parties ] are buying art is not because of their love for it but because it is a good investment.

Any artist who is worth his salt, who has sold a painting in the market, is only going to appreciate in value. If the artist dies in penury at a young age, then the paintings will appreciate faster. No benefits for the artists as far as I can see.

Maximum selling paintings are from the genre of semi-abstract and abstract. The more a painting does not make sense to the buyer, the higher it might sell for.

Being an art middleman/dealer is one of the most lucrative career options nowadays. I have seen full-page advertisements of a particular art dealer in the daily newspaper’s city supplement. An art dealer I know personally makes atleast ten times more money than his ad job allowed him.

It’s a good time to be in the market for an artist, good time for Indian art - show and sell. And as far as I can see, it will only get better. I wish I’d get some percentage of sale value when my painting exchanges hands more than once!

2 Responses to “the state of Indian Contemporary Art

  • 1
    Anil
    December 24th, 2006 16:18

    Too abstract I’d say especially after checking out Jahangir, NGMA, and other places over the past 3 years.

    Except maybe for a Paresh Maity show which was striking. There’ve been other notables, but again, too abstract.

  • 2
    naina
    January 9th, 2007 23:07

    I’d agree with you if I myself wasn’t striving to be abstract :) But yes, you do have a point!

Leave a Reply